Impact of Early Cannulation Grafts on Quality and Cost of Care for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Peer Reviewed Scientific Publication

Home/Publications and Presentations/Quality and Cost of Care for Patients With Kidney Disease

Background

The annual cost of care associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) per patient on hemodialysis is approaching $100,000, with nearly $42 billion in national spend per year. Early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ECAVGs) help decrease the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), thus potentially decreasing the cost of care. However, a formal financial analysis that also includes the cost of CVC-related complications and secondary interventions has not been completed. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the overall financial costs associated with ECAVGs on patients with ESRD during a one-year period.

Recent Posts

  • A screenshot of the Lancet paper discussing hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19

Follow up on our Lancet paper

May 25th, 2020|0 Comments

Follow up on our Lancet paper Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis We, at Surgisphere, appreciate the enthusiasm [...]

Methods

Access modality, complications, secondary interventions, hospital outcomes, and cost of care were determined for 397 sequential patients who underwent access creation between July 2014 and October 2018. A detailed financial analysis was completed, including an evaluation of implant, supplies, medications, laboratories, labor, and other direct costs. All variables were measured at the time of the index procedure, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, and one year.

Results

There were 131 patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 266 who underwent ECAVG for dialysis access. The average cost of care was $17,523 for AVF and $5,894 for ECAVG at one year (P < 0.01). Fewer CVC-related complications and secondary interventions associated with ECAVGs saved $11,630 per patient with ESRD, primarily in the form of supply costs. Fewer CVCs in the patients receiving ECAVGs led to an additional $1,083 decrease in cost associated with sepsis reduction at one year. A subsequent decrease in length of stay and ICU utilization led to an additional $2.0 million decrease in annual cost of care for patients with ESRD.

$0
Million Decrease in Hospital Costs
P = 0
Survival Advantage
$0
Decrease in Costs

Conclusions

The use of ECAVGs has significant cost savings over using an AVF and CVC for urgent-start dialysis in patients with ESRD. This cost savings is secondary to decreased CVC-related complications and fewer secondary interventions. Significant national savings are possible with appropriate use of ECAVGs in patients with ESRD.

Events

Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society

September 10 @ 8:00 am - September 12 @ 5:00 pm

Data Acquisition
Data Warehousing
Data Analytics
Data Reporting

Related Posts

Get started with our industry leading solutions today

Looking for help? Get in touch with us

By |2020-03-22T03:25:18-05:00February 15th, 2020|Publications and Presentations|0 Comments

About the Author: